Conference Presentations

This session will focus on using research tools to collect data to support online learners. We will discuss our journey in re-developing an online learner readiness instrument at two universities. We will describe our collaborative research process and share the results of our validation study. Then we will discuss how the Learning Skills Journey Tool has been re-conceptualized to support undergraduate learners in self-assessment, connecting students with resources and support services, and helping student support coaches identify opportunities for students to develop learning skills.

All too often, online course quality is determined by a course’s compliance with industry standards rather than consultation with actual students. In this session, we will share how we used research-based methods to develop a Student Advisory Board for Instructional Technology, ensuring that student feedback is actively used in refining online course evaluation and improvement strategies.

Using QM Standards as a foundation, the Student Success Seminar (a required course for all freshmen) was redesigned to include more student interaction, engagement, individualization, choice, and support. We created an online shell that all courses, on and off campus, face-to-face or online, use so that sections being taught across the state would be consistent. We enlisted faculty and staff members, part-time instructors, community members, and students to help develop modular content and share their expertise.

How might we creatively use the QM Rubric to inform the design and/or review of our face-to-face courses? What are the barriers to using the Rubric in this manner? Could a new Rubric be developed that is specific to face-to-face course design?

Review Readiness: Establishing internal review processes to prepare for QM certification reviews is a session that shares one institution's strategy for structuring an internal review process that drives faculty buy-in and course certification.

Review Readiness: Establishing internal review processes to prepare for QM certification reviews is a session that shares one institution's strategy for structuring an internal review process that drives faculty buy-in and course certification.

Accessibility is a hot topic in higher education and for good reason—education should embrace and welcome learners of all abilities. We, as college administrators, faculty and staff, are responsible for ensuring an inclusive learning environment for all of our students. What’s the difference between accommodation and accessibility? How do you ensure your courses are accessible for all students? We’ll share our road-trip experience from three perspectives: disability services coordinator, faculty and instructional designer.

How do we help students reach their learning goals? In this presentation, attendees will examine strategies for beginning with the end in mind, creating measurable learning objectives, and adding effective content to their learning management system.

How do we help students reach their learning goals? In this presentation, attendees will examine strategies for beginning with the end in mind, creating measurable learning objectives, and adding effective content to their learning management system.

How do we help students reach their learning goals? In this presentation, attendees will examine strategies for beginning with the end in mind, creating measurable learning objectives, and adding effective content to their learning management system.

This presentation outlines the incentives, objectives, process, outcomes, and faculty reflections for rolling out QM on a campus of 20,000 students. 

University's COLT course (Certificate for Online Learning and Teaching) and how the COLT course can be used as a model for training instructors to achieve quality in online programs at your institution.

University's COLT course (Certificate for Online Learning and Teaching) and how the COLT course can be used as a model for training instructors to achieve quality in online programs at your institution.

How do you deconstruct an existing course so that you can easily see what needs to be revised for it to meet established best practices in online course design? In this session you will learn to use a tool that makes it (almost) child's play to build or revise online courses that meet QM expectations.

Additional resources from presentation

SARA is a voluntary state-level process agreement that allows institutions to offer distance education courses and programs to residents of other states/members of the Agreement.  Along with many other states, Ohio is now a member of the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA).

Learn what it takes to grow your own Certified Face-to-Face and Online Facilitator and how to train your entire faculty in Applying the Quality Matters Rubric (APPQMR), at the same time saving a significant amount of money!

Demonstration of the Cidi Labs Design Tools in Canvas will be shown, both screenshots and a live demo, wireless connectivity permitting.  We will also discuss the steps we took to create templates to help meet specific QM standards.  Participants will also be shown how to request a sandbox with Cidi Labs to try out the tools themselves.  A question/answer session will also be included at the end of the talk.

This session provides participants with tools to review their own objectives from the course level through to the activity level. Whether you are building up or building down, the components and process to create measureable objectives remain the same.

Looking for ideas to expand quality assurance at your institution? In this session, we will reflect on a multi-faceted five-year plan to elevate online course quality at a large public university. You’ll come away with ideas for designing professional development to scale up your own QM plan.