Preparing for a Formal QM Review: Comparing 3 Models

Description

How do you ensure consistent quality in formative, internal reviews? A full QM review is a significant investment of time and funds -- How can you be confident that a course and a faculty member are “ready” before they go up for a full review? This situation is faced by many QM institutions. In this moderated panel, QM Coordinators from three universities (New Mexico State, Texas A&M International, and Indiana) will compare and contrast how they have approached this challenge.

Topics covered include faculty buy-in, review structures, funding models, use of QM professional development opportunities, and more.

This handout provides:

  • each panelist's answers to our 4 guiding questions
  • links to publicly available resources from each institution 
  • links to email the presenters
Presenter First Name:
Indiana University, Texas A&M International University,
Presenter Last Name:
New Mexico State University
Presenter Email:
rpetrina@iu.edu