Curated Resources

The term "QM Research" relates to several different types of research. There is research that supports the QM Rubric and process, research that discusses its use, and research that focuses on its impact.

Recent Literature Reviews

K-12

• 2019 K-12 Dissertation Literature Review Summary
• 2019 K-12 Article Literature Review Summary
• 2018 Literature Review for revising the National Standards for Quality Online Courses
• 2018 Literature Review for revising the National Standards for Quality Online Teaching
• 2018 Literature Review for revising the National Standards for Quality Online Programs
• Review of K-12 Online and Blended Education Research Literature

Higher Education

• 2019 Higher Education Literature Review Summary
• 2017 Literature Review Summary Report in preparation for the Higher Education Rubric, Sixth Edition
• 2013 Literature Review Summary Report in preparation for the Higher Education Rubric, Fifth Edition
• Searchable QM Research Library incorporating references prepared for all editions of the Higher Education Rubric that support and inform it

Teaching

• Online Instructor and Teaching Competencies Literature Review
• Online Instructor and Teaching Competencies: Further Analysis of the 2016 Literature Review for Quality Matters

White Papers

• Academic Rigor White Paper 1: A Comprehensive Definition
• Academic Rigor White Paper 2: Contextualizing Academic Rigor
• Academic Rigor White Paper 3: Aligning Institutional Processes to Support Academic Rigor
• Administrative Support for Digital Accessibility: Policies and Processes
• Course Design for Digital Accessibility: Best Practices and Tools

Reports

The Changing Landscape of Online Education (CHLOE) Reports

Effects of QM

Student-Focused

1. Student Perceptions of the Impact of Quality Matters–Certified Online Courses on Their Learning and Engagement
   Sadaf, A., Martin, F., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2019). Access article
2. Evaluating a blended course for Japanese learners of English: Why Quality Matters 
   Alizadeh, M., Mehran, P., Koguchi, I., & Takemura, H. (2019). Access article
3. Course Design, Quality Matters Training, and Student Outcomes
   Hollowell, G. P., Brooks, R. M., & Anderson, Y. B. (2017). In The American Journal of Distance Education. See study
4. Student Feedback on Quality Matters Standards for Online Course Design
   Crews, T. B., Bordonada, T. M., & Wilkinson, K. (2017, June). EDUCAUSE Review. Access article
5. The Effect of Age and Employment on Students’ Perceptions of Online Course Quality
   Barczyk, C., Hixon, E., Buckenmeyer, J., & Ralston-Berg, P. (2017). In The American Journal of Distance Education. Access article
6. Online Graduate Course Evaluation from Both Students' and Peer Instructors Perspectives Utilizing Quality Matters
   Kwon, K., DiSilvestro, F. R., & Treff, M. E. (2016). Access article
7. The Impact of Findability on Student Motivations, Self-Efficacy, and Perceptions of Online Course Quality 
   Simunich, B., Robins, D. B., & Kelly, V. (2015). Access article
8. How a Historically Black College (HBCU) Established a Sustainable Online Learning Program in Partnership with Quality Matters 
   Harkness, S. S. J. (2015) See study
9. Usability in Online Course Design: Comparative Perspectives on Ease-of-Use, Satisfaction, Motivation, and Teacher Presence
   Myers, J. H. (2015). Unpublished dissertation, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. Access dissertation
10. The Effect of Quality Matters Certification on Learner Satisfaction, Grades, and Retention at FIU/Online
    Miner, A. G. (2014). Unpublished dissertation, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD. Access dissertation 
11. Surveying Learner Perspectives of Quality: Value of QM Rubric Items
    Ralston-Berg, P. (2014). See study
12. Effect of Student Readiness on Student Success in Online Courses 
    Geiger, L. A., Morris, D., Subocz, S. L., Shattuck, K., & Viterito, A. (2014). See study
13. Program Administration and Implementation of an Online Learning Initiative at a Historically Black College University
    Harkness, S. S. J. (2014b). In M. Orleans (Ed.), Cases on Critical and Qualitative Perspectives in Online Higher Education. Access chapter
14. Online Course Quality: The Learner Perspective
    Ralston-Berg, P. (2011). Unpublished survey results, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
15. Impact of Quality Matters Recognition on Course Attrition Rates: Final Report
    Diomede, S. (2011).
16. Learner and Faculty Perceptions Before and After a Course Meets QM Standards
    Parscal, T., Frey, B. A., & Lucas, G. (2011, November). [2010 QM Research Grant]. Presentation at the 3rd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Baltimore, MD. 
17. Quality Matters Rubric as 'Teaching Presence': Application of CoI Framework to Analysis of the QM Rubric's Effects on Learner Learning
    Hall, A. (2010, June). [2009 QM Research Grant]. See presentation
18. Improving Learner Satisfaction and Retention with Online Instruction through Systematic Faculty Peer Review of Courses 
    Aman, P. R. (2009). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). 
19. What Makes a Quality Online Course? The Student Perspective
    Ralston-Berg, P., & Nath, L. (2008). 24th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. See paper
20. Quality in Design: Impact on Learner Achievement
    Runyon, J. M. (2006). [2005 QM Research Grant]. Unpublished final report, College of Southern Maryland, LaPlata, MD.
21. How Learner Learning in an Online Undergraduate Course Is Impacted by the Application of QM Rubric Standards: A Grounded Theory Study
    Mott, M. (2006). [2005 QM Research Grant]. Unpublished final report, State University of New York, Canton, NY.  
22. Two Studies Reveal Impact of QM Across Delivery Formats
    Shattuck, K. (2016). See presentation

Instructor-Focused

1. Community College Faculty Perceptions of the Quality Matters™ Rubric
   Gregory, R. L., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Cook, V. S. (2020). Community college faculty
   perceptions of the Quality Matters^TM Rubric. Online Learning, 24(2), 128-141.
   https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2052. See article
2. Quality Assurance Implementation and How It Works
   Altman, B., Shattuck, K., Simunich, B., & Burch, B. (2020). See article 
3. The Effect of Instructors Training on Technology Adoption, Course Design, and Student Experiences: A Multiple Case Study of Training Based on Tpack or Quality Matters
   Aqui, Yvette. (2018). In ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Access dissertation 
4. A Delphi Study to Examine the Quality Measurement Standards by Online Instructors Using the Quality Matters™ Rubric as a Basis for Creating Instructional Materials
   Robinson, D. J. (2017). In ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Access dissertation
5. Factors Influencing Participation in Professional Development to Promote Online Course Excellence and the Impact on Faculty Confidence and Teaching
   Mascher, E. (2016). In ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Access dissertation
6. The Power of a Collaborative, Collegial Approach to Improving Online Teaching and Learning
   Bogle, L., Day, S., Matthews, D., & Swan, K. (2014). In Assuring Quality in Online Education: Practices and Processes at the Teaching, Resource, and Program Levels. Access chapter
7. Impacts of a Quality Matters^TM Workshop on Faculty Who Design, Develop, and Deliver Online Courses: A Mixed Methods Study
   Mercer, R. E. (2014). In ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Access dissertation
8. Learner and Faculty Perceptions Before and After a Course Meets QM Standards
   Parscal, T., Frey, B. A., & Lucas, G. (2011, November). [2010 QM Research Grant]. Presentation at the 3rd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Baltimore, MD.  
9. The Effect of Quality Matters on Faculty's Online Self-Efficacy
   Wright, J. (2010, June). Presentation at the DLA Conference 2010. See article
10. The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Instructors Using Quality Matters Training, Rubric, and Peer Collaboration
    Ward, C. (2011, November). [2010 QM Research Grant]. Presentation at the 3rd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Baltimore, MD.
11. The Impact of Learning Activities on Online Course Completion
    Loser, R., & Trabandt, J. (2006). [2005 QM Research Grant]. Unpublished final report, Northern Virginia Community College, Alexandria, VA. 

Institution-Focused

1. Evaluating Online Course Quality: A Study on Implementation of Course Quality Standards
   Zimmerman, W., & Altman, B., Simunich, B., Shattuck, K., & Burch, B. (2020). See article
2. A 'Just-in-Time' Pragmatic Approach to Creating Quality Matters-informed Online Courses
   Murillo, A., & Jones, K. M. L, (2020). See article
3. A Community of Quality: Using Social Network Analysis to Study University-Wide Implementation of QM
   Richter, S., Miller, T., Cowan, J., & Click, A. (2017). See presentation
4. Measuring Online Course Design: A Comparative Analysis
   You, J., Hochberg, S., Ballard, P., Xiao, M., & Walter, A. (2014). See study
5. Integrating Quality Matters into Hybrid Course Design: A Principles of Marketing Case Study
   Young, M. R. (2014). See study
6. An Overview of the Quality Matters Peer Review Process for Online Course Design
   Varonis, E. M. (2014). See article
7. Improving Courses Across an Online Program: A Design-Based Approach
   Swan, K., & Matthews, D. (2012). Paper at the 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. Access paper
8. IBSTPI, Quality Matters, and Online Learning: What’s Right and What Needs Changing? 
   Bose, E. V. (2012). See study 
9. Instructional Design and Online Learning: A Quality Assurance Study
   Monroe, R. (2011). Access study
10. The Relationship Between Course Design and Learning Processes
    Swan, K., Matthews, D., & Bogle, L. R. (2010, June). The relationship between course design and learning processes.  [2009 QM Research Grant]. Presentation at the 2nd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Oak Brook, IL. 

QM-Related Publications and Presentations (See also Conference Presentations for QM Conference Presentations from 2013 on)

1. Quality Matters: An Educational Input in an Ongoing Design-Based Research Project
   Adair, D., Shattuck, K. (2015). Access article 
2. Measuring the Impact of the Quality Matters Rubric: A Discussion of Possibilities
   Legon, R. (2015). Access article 
3. Analysis of Peer Review Comments: QM Recommendations and Feedback Intervention Theory
   Schwegler, A. F., & Altman, B. W.  (2015). Access article
4. Program Administration and Implementation of an Online Learning Initiative at a Historically Black College University: A Case Study
   Harkness, S. S. J. (2014a, March 10). [Webinar]. See presentation
5. Beliefs Regarding Faculty Participation in Peer Reviews of Online Courses
   Altman, B. W., Schwegler, A. F., & Bunkowski, L. M. (2014). See study 
6. Beyond the 'Applying the Quality Matters Rubric' Workshop
   Dowden, L. (2014, March 10). [Webinar]. In EDUCAUSE/Quality Matters Online and Blended Learning: Institutional Case Studies on Implementing a Quality Assurance Program and Designing Research on Effective Practice Webinar Series. 
7. Teaching Faculty to Design Online Courses - Centering QM in a Historically Decentralized Process
   Mercer, R. E., & Ritter, N. L. (2014). Presentation at the 3rd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Baltimore, MD. 
8. QM Implementation
   Parscal, T. (2014, March 10). [Webinar]. See presentation
9. Measuring the Impact on Learner Engagement in the Redesigned Blended Course Using Quality Matters Standards
   Knapp, B., & Paull, J. (2013, September). 2013 QM Research Grant presentation at the 5th Annual Quality Matters Conference, Nashville, TN. See presentation 
10. Excuse Me Sir, Here's Your Change: Cognitive and Affective Effects of the Apply the Quality Matters Rubric Workshop
    Mercer, R. E. (2013). Presentation at the 5th Annual Quality Matters Conference, Nashville, TN. See presentation
11. An Accessibility Policy for Online Programs
    Frey, B. A., Kearns, L. R., & King, D. R. (2012, October). 2012 QM Research Grant presentation at the 4th Annual Quality Matters Conference, Tucson, AZ. See presentation 
12. Accessibility Benchmarking Survey
    Frey, B. A., & King, D. R. (2011, November). Accessibility benchmarking survey.  Presentation at the 3rd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Baltimore, MD. 
13. From the Ground Up: Conceptions of Quality in Course Design for Web-Support Education
    Greenberg, G. (2011). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. See dissertation 
14. What Makes a Quality Online Course? The Learner Perspective
    Ralston-Berg, P. (2011, November). Presentation at the 3rd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Baltimore, MD. 
15. Quality Matters: A Case of Collaboration and Continuous Improvement for Online Courses
    Shattuck, K. (2011). In S. Huffman, S. Albritton, B. Wilmes, and W. Rickman (Eds.), Cases on Building Quality Distance Delivery Programs: Strategies and Experiences (pp. 146-157), Hershey, PA.: Information Science Reference. 
16. Quality Matters Rubric as 'Teaching Presence': Application of CoI Framework to Analysis of the QM Rubric's Effects on Learner Learning
    Hall, A. (2010, June). [2009 QM Research Grant]. See presentation
17. The Impact of QM Standards on Learning Experiences in Online Courses
    Knowles, E. E., & Kalata, K. (2010, June). Presentation at the 2nd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Oak Brook, IL. 
18. Research Brief: The Use of Standards for Peer Review of Online Nursing Courses: A Pilot Study
    Little, B. R. (2009). See article   
19. Using Web 2.0 Technologies to Meet Quality Matters (QM) Requirements
    Pollacia, L., & McCallister, T. (2009). See article

QM Grant Initiative and Early QM Grants

1. Measuring the Impact on Learner Engagement in the Redesigned Blended Course Using Quality Matters Standards
   Knapp, B., & Paull, J. (2013, September). 2013 QM Research Grant presentation at the 5th Annual Quality Matters Conference, Nashville, TN. See presentation
2. The Impact of Findability on Learner Motivations, Self-Efficacy, and Perceptions of Online Course Quality
   Simunich, B., Robins, D. B., & Kelly, V. (2012, October). [2012 QM Research Grant].
3. Learner and Faculty Perceptions Before and After a Course Meets QM Standards
   Parscal, T., Frey, B. A., Lucas, G. (2011, November). [2010 QM Research Grant]. Presentation at the 3rd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Baltimore, MD.
4. The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Instructors Using Quality Matters Training, Rubric, and Peer Collaboration
   Ward, C. (2011, November). [2010 QM Research Grant]. Presentation at the 3rd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Baltimore, MD.
5. The Relationship Between Course Design and Learning Processes
   Swan, K., Matthews, D., & Bogle, L. R. (2010, June). The relationship between course design and learning processes. [2009 QM Research Grant].
   Presentation at the 2nd Annual Quality Matters Conference, Oak Brook, IL.
6. Quality Matters Rubric as 'Teaching Presence': Application of CoI Framework to Analysis of the QM Rubric's Effects on Learner Learning
   Hall, A. (2010, June). [2009 QM Research Grant]. See presentation
7. Quality in Design: Impact on Learner Achievement
   Runyon, J. M. (2006). [2005 QM Research Grant]. Unpublished final report, College of Southern Maryland, LaPlata, MD. 
8. The Impact of Learning Activities on Online Course Completion
   Loser, R., & Trabandt, J. (2006). [2005 QM Research Grant]. Unpublished final report, Northern Virginia Community College, Alexandria, VA. 
9. How Learner Learning in an Online Undergraduate Course Is Impacted by the Application of QM Rubric Standards: A Grounded Theory Study
   Mott, M. (2006). [2005 QM Research Grant]. Unpublished final report, State University of New York, Canton, NY. 
10. Effect of a QM Reviewed Course on Learner Evaluation
    Finley, D. L. (2005). [2004 QM Research Grant]. Unpublished final report, Largo, MD:  Author. 
11. Apply QM Rubric to Blended Courses
    Iyengar, S. (2006, March). [2005 QM Research Grant]. Presentation at MDLA Conference, Linthicum Heights, MD. 
12. Quality Matters: Ensuring the Quality of Online Courses
    Sax, C., and Schumaker, R. (2006). DE Oracle @ UMUC.  
13. Quality Matters: Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning
    Sener, J. (2004). See article 
14. Quality Matters Update
    Sener, J. (2005). 
15. Quality Matters: Inter-Institutional Quality Improvement for Online Courses
    Sener, J. (2006). See article 
16. Quality Matters: Collaborative Program Planning at a State Level
    Shattuck, K. (2007). See article