Conference Presentations

search by keyword

We're in This Together: Leveraging Online Collaboration

One of the great debates that Professors/Instructors have is whether or not to incorporate a group assessment. Many concerns exist related to collaborative activities, but there is research to suggest that student to student interaction is beneficial to student learning outcomes. In fact, alongside the QM Rubric which has a category of learning interaction/engagement, our presentation will also include up to date research revolving around Social Learning theory.

We're in This Together: Levereging Online Collaboration

One of the great debates that Professors/Instructors have is whether or not to incorporate a group assessment. Many concerns exist related to collaborative activities, but there is research to suggest that student to student interaction is beneficial to student learning outcomes. In fact, alongside the QM rubric which has a category of learning interaction/engagement, our presentation will also include up to date research revolving around Social Learning theory.

We're in This Together: Levereging Online Collaboration

One of the great debates that Professors/Instructors have is whether or not to incorporate a group assessment. Many concerns exist related to collaborative activities, but there is research to suggest that student to student interaction is beneficial to student learning outcomes. In fact, alongside the QM Rubric which has a category of learning interaction/engagement, our presentation will also include up to date research revolving around Social Learning theory.

We're Not Just in Kansas Anymore: Faculty Perspectives on Online Course Development and Delivery

Moving faculty from teaching in a traditional classroom to teaching online can be a difficult task. Uncovering factors that influence participation in professional development designed to support quality online course development can provide valuable insight. This session will share research results concerning factors impacting faculty participation in Quality Matters professional development at a midwest teaching university.

Wellness for Educators

Connection, community, support, and inclusion are critical to establishing a foundation for learning. Cultivating a sense of belonging is crucial for this foundation. We will talk about the science and research behind sense of belonging and its connection to learning and mental health and wellbeing. The panel will also specifically talk about how fostering a sense of belonging is vitally important within digital learning environment not only for your learners but also for yourself as an educator.

We’re In This Together: Classroom Strategies and Technologies to Implement Trauma-Informed Pedagogy

With growing concerns about student wellbeing in higher education, this session provides an overview of trauma-informed pedagogy and its application to teaching and learning. Specific classroom strategies and technologies addressing toxic stress/promoting self-care for students will be highlighted.

What can Online Learning do that Face-to-Face Learning Cannot? Insights from Online Instructors

Online learning was once viewed as an educational “alternative”- but attitudes may be shifting. Are there benefits to online learning that exceed face-to-face courses? This poster shares results from a qualitative study with online instructors who discussed perceptions of the benefits unique to learning online. The analysis includes ways in which instructors’ perceptions varied based on years of teaching experience. Results provide insights for faculty development and course design.

What does "Quality" in an Online Course Mean to Students, Faculty, and Administrators?

The purpose of the present study is to understand faculty, student, and administrator perceptions of quality in distance education courses. Our research question was: What is the meaning of "quality" in an online course to administrators, faculty, and students? Qualitative data revealed the top 7 quality features and the discrepancies among the rankings of the 7 quality features among faculty, students, and administrators.

What is it Like to Use QM on Campus?

What is it like to use QM on Campus? What does QM adoption mean for faculty members? How does QM impact the administrators and staff responsible for online course support and creation? What effect do institutional factors (size, research status, private/public, faculty type, mission, etc.) have on how QM is adopted? What kind of roles do instructional designers, media developers, curriculum support specialists, and other staff play at QM institutions? Questions like these are raised on a regular basis by individuals contemplating the adoption of Quality Matters.

What is Open? Adopting and Liberating an Open Music Appreciation Textbook

Having been denied access to the source files for an allegedly "open" Music Appreciation textbook, I will talk about the concept of openness in OERs, as well as the process of converting a PDF textbook into and open and accessible format.

Intended audience: Anyone interested in open educational resources and accessibility. The talk could be tailored to people of very high technical ability who are developing resources of their own.

What is the Heartbeat of QM on Your Campus

What is the heart beat of QM on Campus? What does QM adoption mean for faculty, instructional designers, administrators and professional staff responsible for online course quality. What effect do institutional factors (size, research status, private/public, union/non-union/adjunct faculty, mission, tenure/promotion, etc.) have on how QM is adopted? The panel members will address commonly asked questions as well engage the audience participants to tell their muddiest stories on what it is like to adopt and use Quality Matters on Campus.

What Quality Looks Like in Technology-Enhanced Education: Views from CAOs

Chief Academic Officers have responsibility for the quality in their courses, programs and faculty involved in technology-enhanced education. What are the benchmarks that count and how do they know they are hitting them? What does a comprehensive approach to quality assurance look like from their vantage point? How do they know if they are offering students a quality learning experience? CAOs from institutions with significant commitments to quality in technology-enhanced education will offer their views on how they have navigated the quality question.